Review



custom microarray customarraytm 12k arrays  (CombiMatrix)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    CombiMatrix custom microarray customarraytm 12k arrays
    Custom microarrays analysis . A) Bar plot of UCEs expressed across 4 mouse developmental stages tested (ES, E12.5, E14.5 and E16.5) based on the analysis of our UCE custom <t>microarray.</t> Blue bars indicate UCEs which show expression on a single strand, green columns indicate UCEs which show expression on both strands B) Venn diagram of UCE transcription results showing the overlap across the 4 stages analyzed. More than half (n = 140, 56%) of the transcribed UCEs are expressed in all the stages analyzed.
    Custom Microarray Customarraytm 12k Arrays, supplied by CombiMatrix, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/custom microarray customarraytm 12k arrays/product/CombiMatrix
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    custom microarray customarraytm 12k arrays - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Promiscuity of enhancer, coding and non-coding transcription functions in ultraconserved elements"

    Article Title: Promiscuity of enhancer, coding and non-coding transcription functions in ultraconserved elements

    Journal: BMC Genomics

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-151

    Custom microarrays analysis . A) Bar plot of UCEs expressed across 4 mouse developmental stages tested (ES, E12.5, E14.5 and E16.5) based on the analysis of our UCE custom microarray. Blue bars indicate UCEs which show expression on a single strand, green columns indicate UCEs which show expression on both strands B) Venn diagram of UCE transcription results showing the overlap across the 4 stages analyzed. More than half (n = 140, 56%) of the transcribed UCEs are expressed in all the stages analyzed.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Custom microarrays analysis . A) Bar plot of UCEs expressed across 4 mouse developmental stages tested (ES, E12.5, E14.5 and E16.5) based on the analysis of our UCE custom microarray. Blue bars indicate UCEs which show expression on a single strand, green columns indicate UCEs which show expression on both strands B) Venn diagram of UCE transcription results showing the overlap across the 4 stages analyzed. More than half (n = 140, 56%) of the transcribed UCEs are expressed in all the stages analyzed.

    Techniques Used: Microarray, Expressing

    UCEs transcription and enhancer function overlap . Overlap between the enhancer dataset (Pennacchio et al, 2006) and the mouse microarray dataset in all samples analyzed, divided by stage. The yellow portion of each bar indicates UCEs that are only transcribed, the green portion UCEs that are transcribed and act as enhancers, the blue portion UCEs that are only transcribed.
    Figure Legend Snippet: UCEs transcription and enhancer function overlap . Overlap between the enhancer dataset (Pennacchio et al, 2006) and the mouse microarray dataset in all samples analyzed, divided by stage. The yellow portion of each bar indicates UCEs that are only transcribed, the green portion UCEs that are transcribed and act as enhancers, the blue portion UCEs that are only transcribed.

    Techniques Used: Microarray

    UCE classification using External datasets . A) Comparison between the mouse enhancer dataset (Pennacchio et al. 2006) (green oval), our mouse development microarray dataset, (red oval), the human UCE expression dataset (Calin et al. 2007) (blue oval) and the mouse ES cell SOLiD expression dataset (Cloonan et al. 2008) (orange oval). B) Comparison of the SOLiD ES cell RNAseq dataset (Cloonan et al. 2008) for UCEs vs. randomly chosen non-transcribed genomic regions (outliers not shown).
    Figure Legend Snippet: UCE classification using External datasets . A) Comparison between the mouse enhancer dataset (Pennacchio et al. 2006) (green oval), our mouse development microarray dataset, (red oval), the human UCE expression dataset (Calin et al. 2007) (blue oval) and the mouse ES cell SOLiD expression dataset (Cloonan et al. 2008) (orange oval). B) Comparison of the SOLiD ES cell RNAseq dataset (Cloonan et al. 2008) for UCEs vs. randomly chosen non-transcribed genomic regions (outliers not shown).

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Microarray, Expressing



    Similar Products

    custom microarray customarraytm 12k arrays  (CombiMatrix)
    90
    CombiMatrix custom microarray customarraytm 12k arrays
    Custom microarrays analysis . A) Bar plot of UCEs expressed across 4 mouse developmental stages tested (ES, E12.5, E14.5 and E16.5) based on the analysis of our UCE custom <t>microarray.</t> Blue bars indicate UCEs which show expression on a single strand, green columns indicate UCEs which show expression on both strands B) Venn diagram of UCE transcription results showing the overlap across the 4 stages analyzed. More than half (n = 140, 56%) of the transcribed UCEs are expressed in all the stages analyzed.
    Custom Microarray Customarraytm 12k Arrays, supplied by CombiMatrix, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/custom microarray customarraytm 12k arrays/product/CombiMatrix
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    custom microarray customarraytm 12k arrays - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Custom microarrays analysis . A) Bar plot of UCEs expressed across 4 mouse developmental stages tested (ES, E12.5, E14.5 and E16.5) based on the analysis of our UCE custom microarray. Blue bars indicate UCEs which show expression on a single strand, green columns indicate UCEs which show expression on both strands B) Venn diagram of UCE transcription results showing the overlap across the 4 stages analyzed. More than half (n = 140, 56%) of the transcribed UCEs are expressed in all the stages analyzed.

    Journal: BMC Genomics

    Article Title: Promiscuity of enhancer, coding and non-coding transcription functions in ultraconserved elements

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-151

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Custom microarrays analysis . A) Bar plot of UCEs expressed across 4 mouse developmental stages tested (ES, E12.5, E14.5 and E16.5) based on the analysis of our UCE custom microarray. Blue bars indicate UCEs which show expression on a single strand, green columns indicate UCEs which show expression on both strands B) Venn diagram of UCE transcription results showing the overlap across the 4 stages analyzed. More than half (n = 140, 56%) of the transcribed UCEs are expressed in all the stages analyzed.

    Article Snippet: We therefore designed a custom microarray (CustomarrayTM 12K arrays from Combimatrix, Mukilteo, WA) encompassing 3 different probes on each DNA strand of UCEs (of the currently annotated 481 UCEs, probes could be designed for 475), as well as a large number of negative controls (exogenous sequences from bacteria and plants, negative controls used in the Affymetrix platform, rRNAs sequences), which were used to assess the levels of background signal.

    Techniques: Microarray, Expressing

    UCEs transcription and enhancer function overlap . Overlap between the enhancer dataset (Pennacchio et al, 2006) and the mouse microarray dataset in all samples analyzed, divided by stage. The yellow portion of each bar indicates UCEs that are only transcribed, the green portion UCEs that are transcribed and act as enhancers, the blue portion UCEs that are only transcribed.

    Journal: BMC Genomics

    Article Title: Promiscuity of enhancer, coding and non-coding transcription functions in ultraconserved elements

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-151

    Figure Lengend Snippet: UCEs transcription and enhancer function overlap . Overlap between the enhancer dataset (Pennacchio et al, 2006) and the mouse microarray dataset in all samples analyzed, divided by stage. The yellow portion of each bar indicates UCEs that are only transcribed, the green portion UCEs that are transcribed and act as enhancers, the blue portion UCEs that are only transcribed.

    Article Snippet: We therefore designed a custom microarray (CustomarrayTM 12K arrays from Combimatrix, Mukilteo, WA) encompassing 3 different probes on each DNA strand of UCEs (of the currently annotated 481 UCEs, probes could be designed for 475), as well as a large number of negative controls (exogenous sequences from bacteria and plants, negative controls used in the Affymetrix platform, rRNAs sequences), which were used to assess the levels of background signal.

    Techniques: Microarray

    UCE classification using External datasets . A) Comparison between the mouse enhancer dataset (Pennacchio et al. 2006) (green oval), our mouse development microarray dataset, (red oval), the human UCE expression dataset (Calin et al. 2007) (blue oval) and the mouse ES cell SOLiD expression dataset (Cloonan et al. 2008) (orange oval). B) Comparison of the SOLiD ES cell RNAseq dataset (Cloonan et al. 2008) for UCEs vs. randomly chosen non-transcribed genomic regions (outliers not shown).

    Journal: BMC Genomics

    Article Title: Promiscuity of enhancer, coding and non-coding transcription functions in ultraconserved elements

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-151

    Figure Lengend Snippet: UCE classification using External datasets . A) Comparison between the mouse enhancer dataset (Pennacchio et al. 2006) (green oval), our mouse development microarray dataset, (red oval), the human UCE expression dataset (Calin et al. 2007) (blue oval) and the mouse ES cell SOLiD expression dataset (Cloonan et al. 2008) (orange oval). B) Comparison of the SOLiD ES cell RNAseq dataset (Cloonan et al. 2008) for UCEs vs. randomly chosen non-transcribed genomic regions (outliers not shown).

    Article Snippet: We therefore designed a custom microarray (CustomarrayTM 12K arrays from Combimatrix, Mukilteo, WA) encompassing 3 different probes on each DNA strand of UCEs (of the currently annotated 481 UCEs, probes could be designed for 475), as well as a large number of negative controls (exogenous sequences from bacteria and plants, negative controls used in the Affymetrix platform, rRNAs sequences), which were used to assess the levels of background signal.

    Techniques: Comparison, Microarray, Expressing